Technorati

Stats


Super Bowl pool for a good cause...

Charlie O'Donnell [with a nod from Fred Wilson] has an interesting take on the tried and true Super Bowl office pool going, and it's for a good cause. He's set up a wiki called 100 Bloggers, 100 Boxes with the goal of getting 100 bloggers to fork over $10 each in the name of their favorite charity.

Goal: Get 100 different bloggers to sponsor 100 different Superbowl boxes, with the winnings going to their charities of choice. Please tag/digg/link to this so that we can ensure that we fill these out by the end of the week.

It's a pretty simple concept...fill in your information on the wiki, Paypal Charlie your $10, and then check back to see which numbers you get for the Super Bowl. The payouts are typical of these types of pools:

  • 10% to 1st Quarter Winner
  • 25% to Halftime Winner
  • 15% to 3rd Quarter Winner
  • 50% to Final Score (If game goes into OT, Final Score is final at end of game)

At the very least, you get to expose a worthwhile charity to 99 other bloggers and their readership. I'm throwing my hat (and $10) into the ring for the National Association for Gifted Children.


NetSuite glams up its board with Billy Beane...

Netsuite_6 NetSuite is gearing up for an IPO and has apparently decided to glam up its board of directors just in time to do some good old fashioned road show glad handing. Billy Beane, GM (and part owner) of the Oakland Athletics, has joined NetSuite's board of directors.

In case you're wondering if this doesn't have just a little bit to do with Beane's larger than life celebrity in the Valley, just take a look at the title of today's press release:

"Billy's outrageously successful approach in changing the game of baseball by managing using facts to supplement instinct is very similar to the transformation our customers undergo when they move their business to NetSuite," said Evan Goldberg, chairman, co-founder, and CTO of NetSuite. "We are all excited about the insight Billy will bring to NetSuite and our customers."

Changes Game? Hmmmm...hyperbole much? This is not to suggest this wasn't a bold and interesting move for many reasons. Beane has proven himself to be a phenomenal judge of talent, decisive and is 100% committed to challenging the status quo when there is evidence to support a contrarian take. All of those things will be essential toward building NetSuite from a solid SMB-focused SaaS play into a publicly-traded software vendor that's got the weight of the much larger and more established salesforce.com as a direct comparable.

Moneyball_1 I've not had the chance to meet Billy Beane, but like any other math geek who loves baseball, I devoured Moneyball and have followed Beane's career arc religiously. What I find most interesting about today's announcement is it would have the uninitiated believe it's Beane himself who leveraged Sabermetrics and statistical methods to evaluate baseball talent in a more empirical manner. While he's certainly the driving force behind that movement; he wasn't the one who actually crunched the numbers or devised the algorithms.

He was just prescient (and gutsy) enough to find guys who could (like J.P. Ricciardi and Paul DePodesta). If you've read Moneyball, you understand that Beane's talent is not as a mathematical genius, but rather as a man with undying conviction in his beliefs and the will power to push back on long-held truisms if it means success.

With an IPO looming, NetSuite needs to strengthen the independence of its board and this is probably the first of several new appointments I'm imagining. Prior to Beane's addition, the board was comprised of Founder Evan Goldberg, CEO Zach Nelson, VC Deborah Farrington (Starvest) and Steve Fink and Philip Simon, two members of Lawrence Investments [Larry Ellison's personal investment firm].

Today's announcement resonates against the recent news that Lenny Dykstra was starting his own investment fund. Fortune profiled Dykstra's unlikely rise into the world of finance last month; and they captured the bull-in-a-china shop, rough around the edges persona that made Dykstra such an effective major league player. Contrasting Dykstra's in your face style with the polished veneer of Beane (now joining the board of a highly anticipated 2007 IPO potentially) hearkens back to when they were teammates on the New York Mets in the early 80s. In Moneyball, Beane talks a lot about how Dykstra, the guy with limited physical gifts and unremarkable pedigree, managed to outplay Beane (who was a 5-tool prospect and highly touted) because of their respective mental approaches to the game.

From a review in Knowledge@Wharton [free sub required]:

A high school phenomenon who chose pro ball over Stanford, Beane was drafted by the New York Mets in the same draft that brought Darryl Strawberry to the big leagues. Coming up in the Mets farm system, he roomed with Lenny Dykstra, who was destined for a permanent spot in the Mets outfield.

As Lewis tells us, they were two very different kinds of ball players and the contrast is instructive: “Lenny thought of himself and Billy as two buddies racing together down the same track, but Billy sensed differences between himself and Lenny. Physically, Lenny didn’t belong in the same league with him. He was half Billy’s size and had a fraction of Billy’s promise – which is why the Mets hadn’t drafted him until the 13th round. Mentally, Lenny was superior, which was odd, considering Lenny wasn’t what you’d call a student of the game. Billy remembers sitting with Lenny in a Mets dugout watching the opposing pitcher warm up. ‘Lenny says, “So who’s that big dumb ass out there on the hill?” And I say, “Lenny, you’re kidding me, right? That’s Steve Carlton. He’s maybe the greatest left-hander in the history of the game.” Lenny says, “Oh, yeah! I knew that!” He sits there for a minute and says, “So, what’s he got?” And I say, “Lenny, come on. Steve Carlton. He’s got heat and also maybe the nastiest slider ever.” And Lenny sits there for a while longer as if he’s taking that in. Finally he just says, “Shit, I’ll stick him.” I’m sitting there thinking, that’s a magazine cover out there on the hill and all Lenny can think is that he’ll stick him.’”

It'll be interesting to see whether Dykstra [i.e., the trader] or Beane [i.e., the analyst] have the greater success as financial strategists going forward. 

 

Related Threads:

 

Technology and Football...When Two Loves Collide

Nfllogo793970_1 Although I rarely blog about non-tech issues, there are few things in the world I'm more passionate about than the Philadelphia Eagles and football in general.

One of my partners, equally passionate about football although mistakenly aligned with the Baltimore Ravens (just kidding Monty!), pointed out this article from the Baltimore Sun.


An excerpt from the article:

One hour, 45 minutes later, Friedgen was ready to pull out the school's checkbook. What he saw - what he bought - has the potential to change the way offense is coached, not just at Maryland, but across the college and pro levels.

There's a room at the Gossett Football Team House this spring that has been converted into the "simulator room." It's home base for the Terps' pricey new computer program, a cross between a simulator and a video game.

On the computer screen, the Pro Simulator looks very much like a John Madden football video game. But it's much more complex (and much more expensive, costing the department $240,000). When the system is up and running, players will come into the simulator room and sit in front of the computer, using a video-game controller that looks similar to the one you might use for your PlayStation 2.

On the screen in front of the player, he'll choose a play and watch as computerized players approach the line of scrimmage. A question will flash on the screen - "Where is the mike linebacker?" - and the player must answer with the controller. Then the ball is snapped and the player must read the defense, progressing through his receiver options.

The benefits are twofold: Players can learn the playbook through visualization, and they'll learn how to read defenses in real-time. Because the entire playbook will be in the computer, using the simulator will mimic taking actual snaps and reading scout-team defenses in practice.

Video game technology + High end processing power + Cutting edge image processing + Football = something I need to know more about. Unfortunately, I can't find anything on Google or other searches about this Pro Simulator (including the creators), if anyone out there knows more about this, please forward the information along. Hopefully Andy Reid can get one of these systems in place to help offset the loss of Brad Childress this year.

Sporting News: A cautionary tale of old media failing to "get it"

Sporting News, one of the time-honored names in sports news, is on the market according to several sources. Paul Allen purchased Sporting News six years ago for a reported $100 million and has now engaged Allen & Company [no relation] to sell the company with an asking price of $35mm. The company was losing money when Paul Allen bought it, and has never turned a profit under his watch.

This story fascinates me for a number of reasons...

1) I'm an avid sports nut and a voracious consumer of media including print magazines [sometimes it's nice to read something not on screen] and Sporting New remains, for me, BY FAR the best of the major sports magazines. Yet, the company has run a distant third to Sports Illustrated [completely lacking in meaningful content] and ESPN the Magazine [nothing you haven't already read a week before on ESPN.com] in circulation. According to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer:

In the last six months of 2005, Sports Illustrated had an average circulation of 3.23 million, while ESPN magazine had a circulation of 1.89 million, according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations. The Sporting News trailed with a circulation of 715,767. And the magazine's specialty as a publisher of reliable sports data has been rendered less relevant by the wide availability of statistics on the Internet.

2) Years ago, when the Internet bubble was bursting, Sporting News made a decision to put up walls of protection on much of its web content; a poor decision in retrospect. While sites like ESPN left the majority of their content freely accessible, Sporting News lost a TON of momentum and site traffic as everything worth reading was locked behind a $$$ sign that could only be accessed if you paid a monthly subscription fee. By the time the Internet model had been rationalized [i.e., using a combination of subscriptions for premium content along with ad based revenues], Sporting News had lost a HUGE component of its web audience and cache.

3) Sporting News failed to embrace new technologies in terms of the Web and mobile content. While ESPN, Yahoo! and CBS Sportsline were architecting scalable and entertaining java-based fantasy game platforms [that brought both a TON of traffic and subscription fees], Sporting News sat idle. Sporting News response to fantasy gaming? Offering .pdf ebooks that are cumbersome and static.

4) All of this occurred under the stewardship of Paul Allen, a man who became one of the wealthiest people in the country as one of the founders of arguably the most successful technology company of the last twenty-five years.

This should serve as a cautionary tale of how old media brands can [and will] lose relevancy by failing to understand the emergence of new media & channels. Web users are far too mature and frankly spoiled these days to accept an HTML version of a print magazine as an acceptable web presence. Whereas ESPN has masterfully integrated [and monetized] its web presence as part of a global brand, Sporting News lost audience and never caught back up; which led to further stagnation of both the look, feel and utility of the web offering. The magazine, which remains fantastic, has suffered too. Whereas ESPN the Magazine is now virtually subsidized by ESPN.com [note: if you subscribe to ESPN Insider, you get a free subscription to ESPN the Magazine], Sporting News didn't have that option because Sportingnews.com wasn't a destination site.

Hopefully Sporting News will find a buyer who better understands the new media consumer. We want our content in a variety of ways. A well-written magazine still has utility, but needs to be part of an integrated media offering in order for the economics to work.

Flickr to the Rescue: White Sox Parade

Today was a great day for the City of Chicago and White Sox fans as the team celebrated its first championship in 88 years. As a lifelong Sox fan, this was a special day for me too, but it was bittersweet as I was grounded at my office in New York.

Flickr_logo_beta That's where Flickr came to the rescue. Sitting at home tonight, I simply searched Flickr for keywords like "whitesox", "whitesox parade", and "world series" and was deluged with fantastic pictures. It's not like being there, but it was a heck of a lot better than it would've been had the Sox won the title two or three years ago.

I realize "Web 2.0" is fast becoming a cliche, and that the power of the social networking is capable of solving far more profound issues, but today I'm just grateful it helped out Jason Wood -- White Sox fan.

Finally...the White Sox Win it All!

Ozzie+Smallball+Magic+Konerko+88 Years+Momentum = 2005 World Series Champions

Choose_soxlogoWow, what can I say? 30 years old and I finally get to savor a championship for one of the professional teams I root for. The Eagles have come close twice in my lifetime (including a heart breaker last year), the Suns have been bridesmaids, and then come the White Sox.

I'm so used to my teams NOT winning the title I really don't know how to react. Is this what Yankees fans feel like every year (or two, or three...he he he)?

Excuse the ramblings, but I'm downright giddy right now.